William Labov
William Labov is a famous professor, who was the founder of
sociolinguistics and questioned the idea of how social class affected language
and dialect. He used several theories to reinforce his ideas and prove evidence
for his theory.
Martha’s Vineyard
Martha’s Vineyard is a popular tourist destination, lying
just on the fringe of the East Coast of the USA. Martha’s Vineyard is a small
island, meaning the population is fairly small; however there is a consistent
influx of tourists every year. The local people whom live on the island are
labelled as the ‘islanders’; these people live on the island all year round and
are regarded as the ‘middle class’ people of the island. There was another group of people who were
called the fisherman; these people were hard workers who followed the
traditions and old fashioned values of everyday life. The fisherman were known
to be in the ‘working class’ area, and spoke with an accent based around old
fashioned received pronunciation and non-standard grammar use. This certain
accent is known as ‘diphthong’, this
is where a sound is made by two vowels being merged together.
On this island, the island was dissected into labels of how
populated it is, ‘down island’ is the most populated part of the island, where
the tourists and islanders are mostly based. Then there is the ‘up island’, the
less populated part of the island, with this area being where the fisherman
lived. The tourists actually had their
own name on the island, with them being known infamously as ‘the summer people’, as these tourists
often visited in the summer.
Summer people – middle class
Islanders – working class/middle class
Fisherman – working class
Labov’s findings
Labov found that the islanders shifted to speaking as a
fisherman, with them frequently using the ‘diphthong’ accent. This could be
suggested because they are trying not to be like the summer people, they are
using this accent to distance themselves from the summer people. This would be
called divergence, as they are accommodating their language to distance themselves
from the summer people by using the diphthong accent. This means that the
summer people are using the language as a tool to reinforce their island
identity. This is an interesting observation to find, as although a fair
majority of the islanders are middle class and well educated, they would talk
with a diphthong accent which is usually associated with a working class
status. This would be called covert prestige, which means that they are
deliberately using non-standard language and trying to elevate their status on
the island.
Department store theory
William Labov analysed a theory of how employees used
language in 3 different department stores. This theory was based in New York,
Manhattan, which is widely remarked as a place with upper class people. The theory
looks at the link between department stores and social class. Labov tested
these language patterns and linked them to class and prestige.
The 3 Department Stores;
Sak’s 5th Avenue – High
status
Macy’s – Middle status
Klein’s – Lowest status
Labov looked at how employees would utilize ‘the social
stratification of the post vocalic r’, this is the idea of individuals actually
pronouncing the ‘r’ at the end of words. Labov suggested that if you actually
pronounce the ‘r’, then this will mean that you are intelligent and wealthy. In
order to test this with the employees, Labov asked the employees a question in
which the answer will always be ‘Fourth floor.’, he then pretended not to hear
in order for the employee to repeat the answer. By the employee repeating the
phrase, this could show signs of the employee converging their language and
speaking in a different way.
Labov’s findings
The results told Lakoff that the pronunciation of ‘r’ was
stratified by class, and that those with higher socioeconomic status pronounced
the ‘r’ more frequently.
RESULTS:
Sak’s – 62%
Macy’s – 51%
Klein’s – 20%
However it could be argued that these results are flawed, as
it could be argued that just because somebody works in Sak’s, it does not mean
that they are more prestigious and are of a higher class. It could also be
argued that this data and theory is outdated, meaning that this theory cannot
be reflective of today’s society.
Very good Joseph!;-)
ReplyDelete